Crash Gambling
Pragmatic Play Casinos
NetEnt Casinos
Playtech Casinos
Microgaming Casinos
Novomatic Casinos
Evolution Casinos
Merkur Casinos
BGaming Casinos
Play’n GO Casinos
Quickspin Casinos
PayPal Casinos
Skrill Casinos
Neteller Casinos
Debit Card Casinos
Paysafecard Casinos
Amex Casinos
EcoPayz Casinos
Interac Casinos
MuchBetter Casinos
Trustly Casinos
The Fight for Fair Play in Vegas
In the latest twist in a legal saga, a group of former hotel guests are reigniting claims that Las Vegas casino operators have been fixing room prices in violation of antitrust laws.
After a previous lawsuit was dismissed, these plaintiffs are now appealing to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, arguing that some of the city’s largest casino hotels have manipulated prices using data-sharing software.
The stakes are high, with major operators like Caesars and MGM caught in the crosshairs.
The Allegations: Price-Fixing in Sin City
The crux of the lawsuit centres around allegations that Las Vegas hotel giants used the software Rainmaker to share sensitive pricing data. Plaintiffs claim this led to artificially inflated room rates across the city, undermining competition and harming consumers. By challenging the practices under the Sherman Antitrust Act, they seek to hold operators accountable for what they argue is a coordinated effort to drive prices up without regard to market conditions.
The original lawsuit was dismissed, with a federal judge ruling that the plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence of an agreement between the operators. Now, the plaintiffs are pushing back, insisting that the court misinterpreted their claims and overlooked crucial legal precedents.
Algorithms at the Heart of the Controversy
Did data-driven software lead to unfair price-fixing? In their appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the use of algorithmic pricing software effectively allows competing operators to delegate pricing decisions to a single third-party entity. This, they argue, disrupts the competitive market and enables price-fixing. The complaint warns that if the court’s original decision stands, it could shield algorithm-driven pricing from future antitrust scrutiny and lead to harmful consequences for consumers.
This case isn’t the first to highlight concerns around machine-powered algorithms in the hospitality and gaming industries, with similar lawsuits cropping up in other parts of the US as well.
Casinos Push Back: Denials and Defences
Las Vegas casino giants like MGM Resorts, Caesars Entertainment, Treasure Island, and Wynn Resorts remain defiant, denying any involvement in a price-fixing conspiracy and insisting their pricing is driven by market forces. They argue that the claims are unfounded and that there is no evidence of a coordinated effort to manipulate prices. According to the casinos, the plaintiffs have failed to identify any specific individual or moment that marked the start of this supposed conspiracy, undermining the credibility of the entire case.
Moreover, the operators maintain that their pricing strategies are based on market demand, not collusion. They dismiss the notion that software like Rainmaker has led to unjustified price hikes.
The High-Stakes Legal Battle Continues
As the appeal moves forward, the court’s decision could set a powerful precedent for the gaming and hospitality industries. With allegations of price-fixing and algorithmic collusion at the centre, this legal battle is far from over.
Will the plaintiffs succeed in overturning the previous ruling, or will the casino operators continue to ride their wave of victory? Stay tuned – this showdown is just heating up.
Written by 
Select Language